3/29/2023 0 Comments Scrivener chromebookYou can also get the android stuff working with flex. The elegance and comprehensive approach to the management tools and ability to combine web based and android tools is really nice. We use it because its free (outside the management tools subscription), it keeps the students OUT of the OS (for the most part, my kid still got into the command prompt), and the management tools allow a teacher to see what every student is doing, their progress, scores and so forth in real time.Īttempting to do a lot of that on another OS? Big bucks and big development. Last, author doesn't understand the edu market, and the reason why we use a managed chromebook environment isn't "because it's simple". Other than customized drivers and perhaps a few vendor supplied bells and whistles, the experience is the same. Similarly, let's discard the idea that it only runs on usb drives, it can in fact run fine on an internal drive.Īnd the one that says there's some sort of different 'experience' with a branded chromebook/box vs flex. Cloudready folks were afraid to update it, as every time they tried they got more support problems than they could manage. All cloudready really needed was a kernel update to something made in this century. While theres a separate fork for chromebooks and flex, google has brought so much of the cloudready compatibility into the root branch. While a fair slice of folks say that chrome os and flex are completely different, the answer is not really. It's an end user run time that'll run android apps well, and some linux dev stuff. Note what sort of user they are, what they expect their computing environment to look like, what they use now that they're satisfied with, etc.īecause a linux developer using lots of content creation and app development tools isn't a customer for chrome os, and it never was. Now if you are lucky enough to have in your bios something called Virtualization and you can figure out how to turn it on and if it is a new enough version, then you can also have what looks like an easy way to load Linux apps, but no luck for me. I have been using It for a couple of months now and it is fine for that job. Flex is for them and me on my two other computers. Most people use a browser and email and just about everything they do is browser-based. I have a laptop and I have an older computer that I used for work when I was self-employed (retired now) and I don't want to and actually can't upgrade them to Windows 11, so I tried out Flex. If you pay for it then you can copy it and actually a lot more if you look up the decision, as long as you don't make money. Also recording TV shows and movies from On Demand services that I subscribe to using PlayOn (which is legal since the Betamax - HBO decision a hundred years ago in internet time). I have, what I will call, my main computer which I use for Turbotax, downloading files, some video editing, Streaming, Over the Air TV, and recording the programs. It is basically Chrome Browser based with Gmail and you can add a second outside email like my Internet provider email that I have had since cable internet came to Orlando. The whole point of Chrome OS Flex is for people that don't need specialized apps. I was fine until I ran into things that wouldn’t launch (I had a lot of trouble with AppImages, for example), or sluggish performance on some Flatpaks, even on the modern Celeron-based mini PC. I respect ChromeOS for most people, but if you need native software that does not have a web version, your success will be hit or miss. But getting Wine to work right proved difficult - I never did get Scrivener to work right, despite following the same steps I did on Manjaro and Fedora. I could install some software, like VS Code, Obsidian, and Synology Drive thanks to DEB and Flatpak files. The fact that it uses Debian and apt made things smoother for me, having learned most of what I know about Linux on Debian-based distros. The Linux compatibility layer is nice, I’ll say that. But its moderate benefits do not grace Flex, meaning that my homebrew Chromebox and Chromebook were hamstrung.ĬhromeOS Flex lacks Play Store support, which hamstrung my homebrew Chromebook and Chromebox." In my previous experience, I found it serviceable as a patchwork solution. Google touted Android app support as one of the mitigation tools against ChromeOS’ usability problems. While I could live without Discord on my MacBook, Slack on web was much more difficult than the native program.ĬhromeOS Flex lacks support for the Play Store. Every time I’d sign in, they’d open a browser tab and redirect me to the web version. In fact, with Slack and Discord, the apps flat out wouldn’t work. Linux let me do some things I needed, like GIMP, but other things struggled, like Slack. I had access to Chrome, so I could get all of my work bookmarks, history, etc. The former was actually the least offensive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |